Oooh .. application/json then... also i can't aggree on this decision, as stated in my previous post. It is not binary, it is text.
But i dont work for IANA, so be it.. (back to topic) Since this is a official mime, there is more need to leave the "X-JSON" path and move towards application/json.. content-type should be enough to negotiate eval. On 1/20/07, Peter Michaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/19/07, Kjell Bublitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Peter > > [Re official JSON mime-types] > > > None of theme are approved, > > From Douglas Crockford himself > > <URL: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/json/message/337> > > Peter > -- > JavaScript for Rails: http://forkjavascript.org > > > > -- Kjell -- www.m3nt0r.de --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
