On 1/23/07, Kjell Bublitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good call. I am not all against the support of X-JSON. I just would > like to see my suggestion as being added one way or another cause i > thought this was missing.
There is another thing that might speak towards application/json. There is this fracking Norton Personal Firewall application that acts as a web proxy and that injects its own javascript code into pages fetched. When I return JSON data in the return body, I set the content type to application/json, as sending the data as text/html might seduce Norton to mess it up. Although I can't test if it is really necessary (I have no spare machine to infect with Norton). Did someone test a similar setup? Bye, Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
