Christophe Porteneuve wrote: > "Delicious" is very much a matter of taste. I'd like to remind you that > the javascript: URL scheme was never, ever standardized, and I, for one, > never use it. Nor do I know of a single use case that cannot be better > addressed through W3C-compliant techniques, instead of using URLs for a > purpose that was never their concern.
I suspect it's the cleanest possible answer to the JavaScript/DOM FAQ "How do I inject JavaScript into another frame and force it to run inside that frame's context?" Not sure why you are getting self-righteously indignant about the prospect of me abusing the technique. If I don't use it for a public website, then what's the problem? -- Phlip http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
