Now this is my latest code. Is it correct  -->

function getHTML(num) {
        var saf = 0 ;
        var num;
        if(!num) {
            num = num || $F('refid');
        } else {
            num = num;
        }
            var url = '/cgi-bin/tps/search.cgi';
                var pars = {num: num,showallfiles: saf,act:
'showattachedfilesection'};
        new Ajax.Updater( {success: 'placeholder'}, url, {method:
'get', parameters: pars,evalScripts: true ,onFailure: reportError });
  }

Its not working.



On Feb 17, 2:04 pm, Colin Mollenhour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You didn't make the first change that Christophe told you to.. Also, it looks 
> like you commented out the "pars" argument?
> The "var" keyword declares a variable. Doing so may overwrite any other 
> variables in your scope with the same name as Christophe explained, please 
> re-read his very first response. Your function should look like this:function 
> getHTML(num) { var saf = 0 ; num = num || $F('refid'); var url = 
> '/cgi-bin/tps/search.cgi'; var pars = { num: num, showallfiles: saf, act: 
> 'showattachedfilesection' }; new Ajax.Updater( {success: 'placeholder'}, url, 
> {method: 'get', parameters: pars, evalScripts: true ,onFailure: reportError 
> }); }
> Pankaj wrote:This is changed the getHTML function--> function getHTML(num) { 
> var saf = 0 ; var num; if(!num) { num = $F('refid'); } else { num = num; } 
> var url = '/cgi-bin/tps/search.cgi'; //var pars = {num: num,showallfiles: 
> saf,act: 'showattachedfilesection'}; new Ajax.Updater( {success: 
> 'placeholder'}, url, {method: 'get', parameters: pars,evalScripts: true 
> ,onFailure: reportError }); } Its not working . On Feb 16, 7:26 pm, Colin 
> Mollenhour<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:Christophe's suggestions were correct but 
> perhaps you didn't implement them in your code correctly. Please post a live 
> demo or at least your getHTML function again as it is after you changed it. 
> Colin Pankaj wrote:Anyone here ? On Feb 16, 6:18 pm, "Pankaj"<[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>wrote:You want more code ? On Feb 16, 6:02 pm, Christophe 
> Porteneuve<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:OK, so can you at least provide a full 
> code for us to get the whole picture? Online demo would be best;-- Christophe 
> Porteneuve [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to