On 2/19/07, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey Jerod, > > I'm sorry if you felt bruised by my reply, I may have needed to word it > more carefully. > > Ideas are indeed welcome (if you look at the archives, you'll probably > acknowledge this), but when they do not provide enough of a solution, or > when it is improvable, it should be pointed out. > > On your side, you may have wanted to finetune your solution for better > practices before posting a reply; there was no rush; other solutions > were already there, and the OP mentioned he was going to go with > tabindexes (which is good from an accessibility standpoint, BTW). > > Also, I believe my Spinoffs-related remark stands: considering this > group is about Prototype and script.aculo.us, you should try to provide > a solution that leverages what's useful in these (case in point, > Prototype). > > In another context, I would have provided a patched version of your > solution, but since other solutions were already posted, I didn't feel > the need. > > I'm sorry, again, that you felt chastised. It certainly wasn't my > intention. Any good will is welcome here, but we should all strive to > post code that leverages as much best practice and Prototypishness as > possible.
:) Understood and agreed. No hard feelings. Sincerely, > > -- > Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Jerod --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
