ZK has been around for a long time, it's more of a meta framework (integrates with dojo, sau, etc..)
I wouldn't be too worried about them passing stuff off as their own that they didn't create. I'd call what just happened here a mixture of FUD and jumping to conclusions. "Move along now, nothing to see here..." On 3/8/07, Andrew Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 8, 2:44 am, "Richard Quadling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > In looking just at their prototype.js code, the level of similarity is > > extremely high. They've made a few changes to obfuscate the code, but > > nothing to make it unreadable. > > > > I'm sure this is against all sort of fair usage and licensing / > copyright rules. > > > > Stay away until the full copyright is returned. And even then. > > > > If they can't give credit where credit is due, then who knows who they > > will blame for bugs! > > In fairness to them, the licensing is only stripped from the > ShrinkSafe'd version. If you download the full ZK source, there are > uncompressed versions of Prototype and Scriptaculous which have intact > copyright info. > > I don't really know how I feel about this, but it fails to exceed my > Rage Threshold. > > Cheers, > Andrew > > > > > -- Ryan Gahl Application Development Consultant Athena Group, Inc. Inquire: 1-920-955-1457 Blog: http://www.someElement.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
