Hi again, i wasn't really asking of help, i just wanted to know if some are interested in collaborative work around this subject. I've just finished a little starting thing, you can try it on www.axiomes.org/resize/. It detects if your pointer is on the bottom-right corner of the draggable, then changes the cursor, and do resizing instead of dragging. I tested on FF2, and IE 6, and it seems to work. I havn't tested with Draggable options, and at the moment, the only Resizable option is 'tolerance', determining the size in px of the "pointer on corner" detection zone. Any comment and/or improvement is welcome !
Fred On 26 mar, 19:52, Colin Mollenhour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frederick, what kind of help do you want? I really don't need this myself > at the moment but do think it is a cool idea so I can help as time allows > (maybe not much). > Colin > Frederik Eychenié wrote:Hi, i'm new here, and it's my first visit. (and i'm > french, and we all now that we can feel sorry for their english). I was > wondering if someone had already worked on prototype draggable > &resizablecombination before starting developping it myself, and i found you. > So if you're still interested in some help ... (i really NEED this > functionality, and have no lack of motivation even if i'm not really a JS > wizzard) I was thinking of adding an optionnal parameter to the Draggable > class, likeResizable: true, maxHeight :200px, maxWidth : 200px or something > like that, but after some thoughts Colin's SimpleWindow class suggestion > seems to be easier to implement, and better for setting up more otions > later.. I have already tried some tricks with a resize handler in the bottom > right of a draggable container(dragged by a handler too) and it seemed to > work. (tested only under IE 6 an FF2) . Thanks, Fred On 16 fév, 16:33, Colin > Mollenhour<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:I was really asking the former, but if > someone wanted to work on it with me that would be great. The reason I was > asking is I really don't have a use for this myself at the moment (unless it > was to replace PWC) so I'm somewhat lacking the motivation to finish it. > Thanks, Colin Michael Peters wrote:Colin Mollenhour wrote:Is anyone > interested in continued development of this?Are you asking if we want you to > continue to work on it? Or if one of us would be willing to take it over? Yes > on the first count, and maybe on the 2nd. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
