David Dashifen Kees a écrit : > I agree, but the semantics of the word replace, outside of a programming > paradigm, seems to indicate that the new thing will be similar and act > similarly to the old thing. If I replace, for example, one of my old
Point taken, but are you seriously suggesting that we should use words that make sense *even outside of a programming paradigm*? Why would we? Prototype is very much about programming. What about upcoming methods like "curry" then? :-) -- Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD "[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it." --Mark Twain Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
