...it was valid JS, but what I wrote was not the JSON string that was returned.... going by memory as to what the output of the JSON string was, and it's 3:00 a.m. I think you are right that each hash had an ID next to it. ...hold on, I'll get what the actual return string was...
On 6/9/07, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey, > > Mark Holton a écrit : > > How does that look? > > Not too good: it's not valid JSON, and perhaps not valid JS even: in an > associative array, properties should have names; in your top-level > container, the hashes are values with no names associated to them. So > you should use an array as the top-level container, or change your > structure so that each hash is associated to a name. > > -- > Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
