Hey,
Jean-Philippe Encausse a écrit :
> But it is an example. So my question is: should we use
> Element.hasClassName() in a loop
> or something more straight ?
The more concise code is usually better :-) After all, the $$ call will
extend all elements it returns, too. Note, btw, that your call:
$$('a.disabled')
is NOT equivalent to your manual loop: it doesn't look for disabled
classes in the parent nodes of links, but on the links themselves.
You'd want:
$$('.disabled > a')
However, if using hasClassName is critical for whatever reason to your
code, you should not be too fearful: hasClassName,
getElementsByClassName, Element.ClassNames are currently supposed to get
some TLD in Prototype 1.6.
--
Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
