Ok Thanks,

I'm asking this because I often try to separate structure and content
but don't know conventions to use.

For exemple, a Table, visible, with a look n feel or skin should I use:

Table.visible
Table.colored
Table.color
Table.dark / Table.ligtht

How to explain skin ?

Table.red ? Table.automn ?

That's complicated :-)


On 9/24/07, Thomas Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not exactly what you asked for, but Rails and some parts of Prototype
> and script.aculo.us assume the following conventions:
>
> For element id's, use (all lowercase):
>
> blah_blech_blub
>
> For CSS classnames, use (all lowercase):
>
> blah-blech-blub
>
> If you use element ids for numbering, use an integer starting from 1
> as the last part of the element id:
>
> <div id="comment_1">...</div>
> <div id="comment_2">...</div>
>
> Can't say much about naming conventions as for often-used css
> structures (as in your .float class), except that trying to stay away
> from "layout-descriptive" classnames is (for most stuff) the best way
> to seperate your contents from layout.
>
> For example, if your ".float" class really means ".picture" or
> ".annotation", go for that instead; same thing if your "#column"
> element really contains navigation elements, call it "#navigation".
>
> Of course, special cases (e.g. facebook) might need their own naming
> conventions.
>
> HTH,
> Thomas
>
> Am 24.09.2007 um 15:40 schrieb Jean-Philippe Encausse:
>
> >
> > Hi !
> > I'm sorry if the question is a little bit off topic
> >
> > Does any body know a serious website that list naming convention for
> > css classes/ids ? In a large scope:
> >
> > - For layout: #Wrapper, #page, #column
> > - For look: .colored, .float,
> > - For ...
> >
> > I'm not talking about CSS Framework, the goal behind this is to design
> > a generic part of a web site with a kind of css "contract" for other
> > developers.
> >
> > Example ?
> > - Login form of application
> > - Facebook layouts
> > - Generic poll design
> > - ...
> >
> > In Scriptaculous, naming for given widget has been choosen, why or
> > why not ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jp
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Philippe Encausse - Veille / R&D Jalios SA
> > Jp [at] encausse.net - http://www.encausse.com - http://www.jalias.com
> > GTalk: jp.encausse [at] gmail.com - SMS: sms [at] jp.encausse.net
> > Mob: +33 6 82 12 56 99 - Job: +33 1 39 23 92 83 - Tel: +33 1 39 18
> > 90 15
> > Do it Once, Use it Twice ~ Do it Twice, Make It Once
> >
> > >
>
>
> >
>


-- 
Jean-Philippe Encausse - Veille / R&D Jalios SA
Jp [at] encausse.net - http://www.encausse.com - http://www.jalias.com
GTalk: jp.encausse [at] gmail.com - SMS: sms [at] jp.encausse.net
Mob: +33 6 82 12 56 99 - Job: +33 1 39 23 92 83 - Tel: +33 1 39 18 90 15
Do it Once, Use it Twice ~ Do it Twice, Make It Once

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to