There was a change in the underlying DOM that will likely have a lot of
people unhappy - the introduction of importNode() and adoptNode(). More info
at
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Updating_web_applications_for_Firefox_3

On Dec 20, 2007 9:49 AM, Dan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I was fooling around with Firefox 3 Beta 2 and noticed some code I'd
> written previously didn't work.
>
> Here's an example (abbreviated to show the relevant snippets):
>
> HTML:
> <div id="foo"></div>
>
> JS:
> document.observe('dom:loaded', function() {
>  try {
>    $('foo').insert(new Element('p').insert('hello, world'));
>  } catch (e) {
>    alert(e.message);
>  }
> });
>
> In all the current "A-grade" browsers, this works fine. In FF3b2,
> however, the following message is alerted:
>
> "The container of an boundary-point of a range is being set to either
> a node of an invalid type or a node with an ancestor of an invalid
> type."
>
> I've discovered some workarounds to this:
>
> 1. Split the two inserts into two different lines of code, that is:
> var p = $('foo').insert(new Element('p'));
> p.insert('hello, world');
>
> 2. Use update instead of insert, that is:
> $('foo').insert(new Element('p').update('hello, world'));
>
> 3. Insert the explicit HTML, even though I'd prefer not to; that is:
> $('foo').insert('<p>hello, world</p>');
>
> So, my question(s): Is this some sort of Firefox bug that needs to be
> reported, or have I just been using insert() incorrectly and I've just
> happened to luck out in the past? I've tended to favor insert() over
> update() when creating elements just 'cause the element wasn't really
> being updated per se. If anybody's got an explanation for what's going
> on here, I'd love to hear it!
>
> :Dan Dorman
>
> >
>


-- 
Kurt Cagle
http://www.xforms.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to