On Sunday 20 January 2008, Christophe Porteneuve wrote: > Michael Schuerig a écrit : > > Well, if the OP remembers that there's more to AOP than what wrap > > does, I consider myself successful. In the best of all possible > > worlds, someone, possibly even from Prototoype Core, would come > > forth with a full-blown, Prototype-based AOP implementation. > > Perhaps you'd care to build one up and put it in Scripteka? :-) I'm > sure Tobie would love to discuss the innards and philosophy of it > with you :-)
I bet, but I think I pass on that opportunity. First and foremost because I don't have a practical need for AOP in JavaScript right now. My client-side code is architecturally too simple to warrant using AOP. I tend to implement things just for the fun of it, but it is not the best recipe to come up with a robust and maintained library. Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
