aham, good point
On Feb 6, 8:05 pm, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> more http requests = bad!
>
> http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#num_http
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:54 -0800, alex wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I was thinking - wouldn't it be great to have modules for prototype,
> > to load separately? Like we have with scriptaculous -
> > src="scriptaculous.js?load=effects,dragdrop". And that would make it
> > more lightweight.
>
> > Do you think a considerable advantage could be achieved in this way?
> > Just wondering...
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
