Ahh, that does make sense. I am the only dev working on this project, so I do a lot of rake db:migrate VERSION=22 stuff to roll back migrations, trying to do VERSION=20080214017515 is just a hassle.
Being a loner I forget sometimes that people write software with other people... On Sep 9, 11:02 pm, Andrew Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the advantage to the datetime based filenames over the simple integers > is that it allows you to work in branches, make migrations and merge > it all back together later without fear of conflicting migrations. why > would you want to go back? > > On Sep 9, 8:45 pm, Trogdor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was wondering how to get Rails 2.1 migrates to go from generating > > 20080910014108_create_table.rb-esque migrations to the old > > 22_create_table.rb style ones. I am sure that there is some sort of > > advantage in having timestamps in the file name, I just haven't > > figured it out yet. > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Joe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
