Somewhat of an answer, somewhat of a new question... It looks like layouts use namespacing, but "backwards" from everything else. In other words, given my namespaced "admin", It would look for layouts in:
apps/views/layouts/admin/whatever.html.erb I'm wondering why that way and not: apps/views/admin/layouts/whatever.html.erb The advantage to the latter would be that layouts and views would all "live" under the admin folder. Ahh well. Any insight on the why? I.e. why it is this way? -Danimal On Sep 10, 8:48 am, Danimal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > Is it just me or are layouts not namespaced automatically? > > For example, using the typical namespaced admin section, I have: > > apps/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb # for example > apps/views/admin/users/index.html.erb > > I then added this: > apps/views/admin/layouts/application.html.erb > > But it won't use that layout... it's looking for: > apps/views/layouts/application.html.erb > > Why are views namespaced but layouts aren't? There are lots of > "solutions" to this, I know, but I'm trying to understand why Rails > won't look at "apps/views/admin/layouts/" for layouts within the admin > namespace? > > Or maybe I'm missing something? > > Thanks, > > -Danimal --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
