Ramon Tayag wrote: > I would separate it... keep the roles and permission you have with > activefx's tutorial. Then your > > group or channel > has_one :administrator, <necessary options here> > has_many :notables, <necessary options here> > has_many :members, :through => :memberships, <other necessary options > here> > has_many :memberships > > Maybe even the membership model can contain what capacity the user is > in the group? This just popped into my head now.. not too sure if > this would work. Sounds okay though. > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Neil Cauldwell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> my Roles table simply has Administrator, Notable, Member (for Site, >> Firstly, do I need to avoid mixing site permissions in with object >> >> > >> > > > > -- > Ramon Tayag
Thanks, Ramon. This is quite an old post - I've been happily working along with permissions for a while now. In fact, right now, I'm integrating per-permission notifications options, whereby a user can specify which activities they want to be notified about (email) on a per-group basis. If you're interested, I posted a question about notifications & named_scopes, in Railsforum a couple of minutes ago. I've since found a solution for the first question, but, I know there's room for improvement; http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=22509 Also, my friend Ryan, from ThinkRefresh.com, made a screencast about polymorphic permissions after I posed the same question to him; http://thinkrefresh.com/posts/7/polymorphic-permissions Maybe that'll help anyone else who comes across this post... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
