Paperclip is simpler to setup and it does what you're looking for, but AttachmentFu has more features, like selecting which image processing tool and storage medium (you can even store files in a Amazon S3 bucket), so, if you're planning on expansion, AttachmentFu might be a better option, if you're just looking for a simple tool what works, Paperclip may be better.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM, CPerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am working on a Rails app that involves my users uploading used > items for sale. When they upload an item, they will also be uploading > a photo of that item (in the future, possibly multiple images). > > So, the image will obviously be associated with the item listing and > the user listing it. Currently, I am thinking of storing the images on > the server in the file system, but not totally sold on that option. > Maybe you guys could also recommend an appropriate storage method. > > Which plugin would you guys recommend to handle this, Paperclip or > Attachment_fu? What are the main differences between the two and which > is easier to setup and use for my case? > > Thanks! > > > -- Maurício Linhares http://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) | http://blog.codevader.com/ (en) João Pessoa, PB, +55 83 8867-7208 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
