Fernando Perez wrote: > I solved it by appending the first method to the chain. > > > I have another problem: > > I want to chain 2 named_scopes that both have a :joins in their > definition. The problem is that the :joins of the second named_scope in > the chain doesn't get added to the query. IS that normal behavior?
I solved that problem too, it was again the select(*) that was getting in the way. Now another question: can I chain 2 named_scopes that define the :joins option? Is named_scope smart enough to append the two :joins like it does for :conditions? I can't make it happen. Only one of the :joins finds its way in the final query sent to the DB. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
