On Sep 30, 9:36 pm, Cameron McCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our group (team of 4) have done a few small-scale Rails applications.
> They've been successful enough that we're contemplating a much larger
> scale development.
>
> By scale I don't mean the number of users or hits/second or volumes of
> data handled. That really isn't an issue for us, and even if it
> happens we're confident we can deal with it.
>
> What we're most concerned about is scaling to a large number of models
> and controllers. We estimate about 100+ "entities" that we'll need to
> manage, and that doesn't include M:M join tables or general lookup
> tables. Also, some of the tables (thankfully only a few) have more
> than 40 columns.
Are you mostly worried about the "soft" side of this (ie how will
developers get their heads around a large app like this) or have I
misinterpreted your question ?
Fred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
