If you're running the latest rails, this is already implemented :) On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Aryk Grosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Whats the general practice for checking rails environment. > > I often find myself having to do: RAILS_ENV=="development". > > As of recently, I've been starting to see more of > Rails.env=="production". > > Im thinking, we may as well extend "Rails.env" so I could do: > > Rails.env.production? > Rails.env.test? > Rails.env.development? > > Anybody done this? Or any reasons not to? > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > >
-- Maurício Linhares http://alinhavado.wordpress.com/ (pt-br) | http://blog.codevader.com/ (en) João Pessoa, PB, +55 83 8867-7208 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
