This is correct. With mod_passenger you don't need Mongrel, Thin ou Webrick. You connect your Apache directly to Rails.
Watch out because the last time I check this work only on a Linux server. But why would you use Windows anyway for serving Web pages. Hugues On Oct 21, 3:11 pm, Phillip Koebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean-Marc (M2i3.com) wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > if you're looking to load balance multiple mongrels on a single > > machine I'd go with Passenger (http://www.modrails.com/) directly > > under apache... not only it will mange the multiple instances of > > mongrel (start and stop them when needed) but it also serves the > > static files directly through apache. > > Um, unless a big rock fell on my head and I've been unconscious for a > while, you don't use Mongrels with Passenger. That's the point of > Passenger: to remove the need of proxying. Passenger is to Rails as > mod_php is to PHP. > > Peace. > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
