On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes he did. I hadn't seen that one and didn't think of checking it. > Ryan suggests exactly what you've proposed; I've tried it and it > works. Thank you! This is much cleaner, and I get to keep using the > named_scope instead of a method.
Just to be sure Ryan gets the credit, I checked his site and then modified your code according to his example. :-) Craig --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
