I've narrowed the problem a bit. It now seems that follow_redirect in 
one test will break an ActionController's +verify+ directive in another, 
later test.

I am ashamed to say my code fragment was not accurate. Here is the 
correct code:

======
class AdminControllerTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
    # #setup puts user credentials in @session

    def test_approve_not_post
        get :approve, { :id => 3 }, @session
        assert_response :redirect
        assert_redirected_to :action => :list
        assert_equal 'You cannot do this directly.', flash[:notice]

        ### OMITTED IN ORIGINAL - SORRY ###
        follow_redirect
        assert_response :success
    end

    def test_deny_not_post
        get :deny, { :id => 3 }, @session
        assert_response :redirect
        assert_redirected_to :action => :list
        assert_equal 'You cannot do this directly.', flash[:notice]

        ### OMITTED IN ORIGINAL - SORRY ###
        follow_redirect
        assert_response :success
    end
end
======

Note that I have the tests follow the redirect_to arising from the 
failed +verify+.

I have discovered that if I comment-out the follow_redirect and 
assert_response calls in test_approve_not_post, then +verify+ will 
redirect correctly in test_deny_not_post. Remember it was the 
assert_redirected_to, and the redirection hash, that broke.

So now: follow_redirect breaks an ActionController's +verify+ handling. 
before_filter and after_filter don't have this problem. Is this a 
peculiarity of functional tests -- and can I therefore ignore it? I'd 
rather be able to test the redirection.

Should I update beyond Rails 1.2.6? 2.x is not feasible for my 
deployment.

Again, I'm sorry about mischaracterizing the code.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to