> I won't guess what snitko wants to do (his list of reasons may or may > not be comprehensive), but I will say that snitko should choose a > license which is appropriate for his goals. For better or worse his > stated goals aren't really legally enforceable.
Before publishing I talked to some guys and they said publish it under GPL. I looked through the license and it seemed good enough for it. Personally, I give a damn about licenses and stuff, they really make me bored. I don't think there's someone now willing to steal the code to make a competitor web-service, but I certainly would not like that to happen. So if you have any suggestions about the license to use, I'd be grateful. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
