ah thanks On Oct 26, 5:39 am, "Maurício Linhares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not a bug and the order is not incorrect, now rails uses > timestamps to numerate migrations. > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Wes Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am having a problem trying to fix this situation. When I create a > > new model the migration starts at something like > > 2086748394485_create_user.rb instead of 001_create_user.rb. > > > I have been searching for hours trying to find a reason for this. > > > Has anyone else had this problem. > > > Thanks for the help. > > -- > Maurício Linhareshttp://alinhavado.wordpress.com/(pt-br) > |http://blog.codevader.com/(en) > João Pessoa, PB, +55 83 8867-7208
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
