> She thinks that it's better design-wise. > No redundancy, blah blah...
<tongue-in-cheek> She's a Web Designer... she should go design her CSS files and make pretty pictures with Photoshop, and leave the implementation details to those who know about implementation details... the designer shouldn't care if its Rails, or php, or the "Next Big Thing"... after all you don't pee on her images... (you don't do you? Because that would be bad form) </tongue-in-cheek> -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
