Thanks, Fred, for that clarification.

And you are right about  gems.rubyonrails.org.  "gem sources" reports
the I also have http://gems.rubyforge.org.

What do you recommend a senior app developer but a mid-level Rubyist
and junior Railist should have?

Thanks, again,
Richard

On Nov 16, 11:46 am, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 16, 4:00 pm, RichardOnRails
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I recently saw some blogs suggesting the 2.2.0 might not yet be the
> > "released version", though I doubt that because IMHO  the gem
> > installer wouldn't have included it among the available Rails
> > versions. Maybe the articles I saw were outdated.  True?
>
> 2.2.0 is 2.2RC1 (and 2.2.1 is the second release candidate) so those
> blogs are accurate in that neither of those versions are the final
> version of 2.2. You would only get those versions if you had added
> gems.rubyonrails.org to your list of gem sources.
>
> Fred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to