Yes, I'd do it with a custom controller method too. Bas van Westing wrote: > Hi All, > > I would advise you to look at recipe 13 "Handle Multiple Models in > One Form" from Advanced Rails Recipies (by Mike Clark, sold by > pragmatic programmers). It a little too big to post here, so buy the > PDF. > I'm using it and it works great. >
However, it does assume the list of items belong_to another class. Of course I could create a class to hold those items, but I think it would just be easier to create a custom controller method. > Don't try to invent the wheel yourself. Surely that cliché is inappropriate as it is the wheel that is reinvented itself. I'm the Luddite that's resisting the reinvention. If anything I could be using that cliché myself asking the Rest advocates to stop reinventing the wheel :o) However, my point isn't that Rest is bad, but rather that it should not be the only way to use Rails. I hoping that Restless Luddites like me will not be excluded in the splendidness that is Rails. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
