On Nov 18, 10:03 am, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 18, 3:04 pm, Zhoran Tvalve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi there! > > I study Ruby on Rails and met a problem. > > > I placed a class definition code for class which is NOT a Model into > > separate file, assume MyToolClass.rb > > > Then I started working on controller code and required 'MyToolClass' > > use require_dependency instead of require. > > Fred
But if the file name follows conventions (so a class named MyToolClass would go in a file named app/models/my_tool_class.rb or lib/ my_tool_class.rb), then no require or require_dependency should be needed and code changes will be automatically reloaded in development mode. If you're not following naming conventions, then do as Fred suggests :-) Jeff www.purpleworkshops.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
