On Nov 26, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Peter wrote: > Thanks for the answer Rob! > The intention was to avoid the the explicit definition of a join table > in the fixtures, > like it is possible since some months. See 'Let‘s make the HABTM > fixture go away. ' in > http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/Fixtures.html
Hadn't seen that. (But I haven't used a HABTM association in a while either.) > > > For your approach: I will put the omap into a roles_users.yml file, > right? > > Regards, > Peter. Yes, that's right. I noticed that the "YAML Fixtures" section of that page you referenced describes the omap type also. -Rob > > > On Nov 23, 11:46 pm, Rob Biedenharn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:22 PM, Peter wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hmmh, >> >>> even after cleaning up the roles_users (without timestamp) it does >>> not >>> work (Hint from [1]) >>> Tried out different order of fixture importing -> nothing helps. >> >>> So, I switched to the old way to define fixtures [2] and it >>> works :-) >> >>> Regards, >>> Peter. >> >>> [1] >>> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/ >>> ... >>> [2] >>> http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=50 >> >> This is the only message I've looked at, but can you turn the join >> table's fixture into an ordered map: >> >> --- !omap >> - first: >> id: "1" >> role_id: "1" >> user_id: "1" >> - second: >> id: "2" >> role_id: "1" >> user_id: "2" >> >> -Rob >> >> Rob Biedenharn http://agileconsultingllc.com >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
