On Nov 28, 4:15 pm, Andreas Gungl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd be happy if our idea would be picked up and AR would get these iterator
> methods integrated. I've seen lots of people asking for exactly this
> behavior. It's possible to implement, it's easy to implement, and IMHO it
> doesn't break the AR metaphor.
You might want to discuss this on the rubyonrails-core list. It's
where people who want to discuss development of rails itself hang out.
Fred
>
> If you like the idea and want to send feedback, please CC me. I'm not
> subscribed to the list.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
> --
> OTTO Software Partner GmbH, Freiberger Str. 35, 01067 Dresden, Germany
> Andreas Gungl (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Tel. +49-351-49723-140 - Fax: +49-351-49723-119
>
> AG Dresden, HRB 2475
> Geschäftsführer Burkhard Arrenberg, Jens Gruhl
>
> active_record_iterator.tgz
> 9KViewDownload
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
