Yes I think that is possible.. after saving the array in the database trying playing arround with this codes..
.enum .sym Well, I have a doubt if that will work. But there is nothing to lose if you try it.. On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Dave Aronson < [email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 20:38, Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But, if you knew that you'd never want to do any SQL actions > > on that array > > My crystal ball is rather foggy. Must need a good waxing. ;-) > > > wouldn't it execute faster if you just save it as a string? > > Possibly... but the big question is, which is worth more, the few CPU > milliseconds you save, or the hours of programmer-time to make any > changes? > > > And as far as being > > clean, I'd think that not creating a table you didn't need was pretty > > clean, too. > > If you're getting overwhelmed with too many tables, chances are your > app is too "enterprisey" anyway. ;-) > > -Dave > > -- > Dave Aronson, President, Dave Aronson Software Engineering and Training > Ruby on Rails Freelancing (Northern Virginia, Washington DC, or Remote) > DaveAronson.com, Codosaur.us, Dare2XL.com, & RecruitingRants.com (NEW!) > Specialization is for insects. (Heinlein) - Have Pun, Will Babble! (me) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
