Thank you On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Robert Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rodrigo Ruiz wrote in post #1042519: > > I think it would be something like 200 requests/minute. > > Is it ok for rails to handle? > > If it couldn't then you would not be asking this question. Nobody would > have even ever heard of Rails. > > Notice in the following article they talk in terms of thousands of > requests per SECOND. Any framework worth it salt can handle 200 > requests/min with plenty of time to spare. > > http://www.therailsway.com/2009/1/6/requests-per-second/ > > There is some really good advice here to IMHO: > > http://gettingreal.37signals.com/ch04_Scale_Later.php > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
