On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Danimal <fightonfightw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm wondering if there is any elegant way to have some gems locally in > a rails 3.2 + ruby 1.9 project but not have them in the Gemfile and > therefore not in source control. > > The reason is very similar to this: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3752906/how-to-use-a-gem-in-rails-3-without-referencing-it-in-the-gemfile > > I work on a large team and we moved to Ruby 1.9.3 but ruby-debug19 > doesn't work with 1.9.3 unless you do some weird stuff. I got it to > work, but it totally taints the Gemfile (references RVM paths). Plus, > some people on the team don't use or want to use ruby-debug. It occurs > to me that this is probably a bigger problem than my issue. > > Specifically: with bundler, is there some way to have project gems AND > local gems, where the local gems aren't part of the project? > > In my case, I'd then be able to have ruby-debug hacked and configured > for my local development, but it wouldn't be in the Gemfile and thus > wouldn't mess up the other devs. > > Thoughts? >
What about defining a constant in an initializer that is not checked in then do something like what is shown in the bundler section here: https://github.com/bbatsov/rails-style-guide > -Danimal > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
