Colin Law wrote in post #1060321: > On 10 May 2012 15:11, beau trepp <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'll try installing an older version of ruby then. Seems odd, I use RVM, and >> I generally aim for stable so wasn't expecting that to happen. > > I don't quite understand what you are saying here. Do you mean that > you believe Ruby 2 is current stable release? 1.9.3 is current > stable I think. See http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/
Yep, That's why Ruby 2.0.0dev has that "dev' tagged to the end of it. Think of "dev" builds as, "This is not ready for use anywhere." It's just for developers, and contributors to the Ruby language, to try things out and find out what breaks. So thanks to the OP. Now we know at least one thing that breaks with the "dev" release of Ruby. I'm sure there are many, many more things that are broken. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
