On Wednesday, 1 August 2012 03:55:31 UTC-4, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote: > > Thank you so much for your reply Colin. > > I believe you are spot on with your answer and what you suggest will > work and is the correct solution. > > For sake of my sanity though, is this solution more of a Rails > convention or have I been getting standard database design confused in > my head for a number of years? To my previous understanding I still see > it as one vehicle has one vehicle_type. >
Sometimes the names can have extra baggage that makes it confusing - for example, it seems clearer to say "one vehicle belongs to a single vehicle category". --Matt Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/9rdTCbCWv_8J. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
