It's simple. Use AR::Base#becomes
Dheeraj Kumar On Thursday 9 August 2012 at 12:20 AM, Mohamad El-Husseini wrote: > I'm using Rails 3.2. And I'm pretty sure you can. Basically, to get a form to > post to the right model I need to set it up generically. My initial form was: > > = simple_form_for @user do |f| > > To make it work I had to change it to this: > > > = simple_form_for :user, url: user_path(@user) do |f| > To work with link helpers, I added this as resource: > > resources :owners, path: 'users', controller: 'users' > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:43:47 AM UTC-4, Peter wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 7, 2012 11:13:56 AM UTC-5, Mohamad El-Husseini wrote: > > > I want my helpers to generate paths using a superclass instead of the > > > subclasses. Assuming I have Owner and Member that both inherit from User, > > > rails will use the current objects class name when generating paths: > > > > > > Let's say current_user is a mod: <%= link_to current_user.name > > > (http://current_user.name), current_user %> will generate "/mod/:id". I > > > want to force it to generate "/user/:id" regardless of the subclass. > > > > > > I can name the path: > > > <%= link_to current_user.name (http://current_user.name), > > > user_path(current_user) %> > > > > > > But I still want to use the convenience of just passing the object: > > > <%= link_to current_user.name (http://current_user.name), current_user %> > > > > > > > > > Is this possible? > > > > > > > You didn't specify the rails version, but I'm pretty sure the answer is no. > > In Rails 2.3.14 your link to is eventually calling url_for, which calls > > polymorphic_url (through polymorphic_path) since you're not passing it a > > String, Hash or the symbol :back > > (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v2.3.14/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb#L76). > > In turn that eventually calls build_named_route_call, which uses > > RecordIdentifier.plural_class_name(current_user), which is returning the > > class name > > (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v2.3.14/actionpack/lib/action_controller/polymorphic_routes.rb#L154). > > And finally that in turn eventually calls current_user.model_name > > (https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v2.3.14/actionpack/lib/action_controller/record_identifier.rb#L100) > > > > You could look into overriding what model name returns for those classes, > > but that seems really far reaching and dangerous. I'd just use the path > > helper since that best represents what you want to do, which is send an > > Owner or Member object not to /owners/:id or /members/:id but to /users/:id > > instead; ergo the verbosity doesn't seem bad to me, it helps clarify. > > > > As an alternative, you could also define the /owners/:id and /members/:id > > routes and point them at UsersController; not sure if that's okay to have > > the extra routes, but that allows you to keep your shorthand notation, has > > that map to the expected URL, but lets you DRY the underlying controller > > class. > > > > \Peter > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/-NUfQAxSGDMJ. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
