On 12 August 2012 18:36, Sebastjan H. <[email protected]> wrote: > Colin Law wrote in post #1072089: >> On 12 August 2012 17:29, Sebastjan H. <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I say trouble, because when I've installed with RVM I couldn't use them. >>> The system kept saying unknown command for ruby and rails and it >>> suggested to install via apt-get install. So I did. Still nothing. Then >>> I ran the RVM installs again and now everything appears to be in order. >> >> You should not have used apt-get if you are using rvm. But since you >> have now got it working with rvm that is ok. > > This was the only way at the time I could get it working. > >>> >>> However (there's always however with me lately), when I run >>> "rails new tasks" rails actually generates "new" as the application >>> folder. And after "cd new" + "rails server" rails generates another >>> application called "server". >>> >>> What can I do? >> >> You can use rails 3. The rails command has changed since version 2. >> The current version of rails is 3.2.8. If you really want to use >> rails 2 then the guides can be found at >> http://guides.rubyonrails.org/v2.3.11/ > > I don't want to use rails 2, this was all installed by default as I > described above. Are these issues related to Ubuntu? Are other > distributions more aproppriate for RoR?
Ubuntu is excellent for rails. > And finally now what? Should I try and change to rials 3 via RVM? gem install rails will install the latest version of rails in rvm. Note /no/ sudo, because you are using rvm. gem install rails --version a.b.c will install version a.b.c Colin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
