I haven't check it yet, but +1 for having what looks to be a decent spec coverage.
I would advise for you to look into Cucumber and describe your functionality as features, then it would be a lot easier for people to give you feedback (once we know what exactly your gem is supposed to do, and how it should behave under various circumstances). RSpec is great, but is is got too small a scope to grasp the behavior of the system (the gem in this case). Great resource is The Cucumber Book: Behaviour-Driven Development for Testers and Developers (I have no affiliation with that) 2012/8/23 Gintautas Šimkus <[email protected]> > Hassan, I think Sergey simply overlooked that part :) Here it is with very > minimal copy/pasting into a search engine: > > https://github.com/fr33z3/semantic_navigation > > > 2012/8/23 Hassan Schroeder <[email protected]> > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Sergey Gribovski <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > really need feed back. >> >> Feedback: provide a link to your new gem and enough explanation >> of what it does to make people want to click that link :-) >> >> -- >> Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ [email protected] >> http://about.me/hassanschroeder >> twitter: @hassan >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > > > -- > Pagarbiai, > Gintautas > -- Pagarbiai, Gintautas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
