You may be right, but I have found a lot of other posts on Internet that
they complain about "belongs_to". It does not bear the correct meaning for
all cases. For example:

class Product

    belongs_to :status

end

.....Awful. No, the Product does not "belong" to a Status. It "has_a"
status.

Also, "belongs" usually means that a "composition" relationship, such that
if Status were to be removed, the corresponding Product would have to be
removed too.

Another example:

class Product

    belongs_to :type

end

....Awful again. The product Types preexist the Products and a Product does
not belong to a type. "is of" a type.

Certainly, the "belongs_to" as a DSL does not describe the domain on the
particular cases.

Thanks for letting me know that my workaround will work. I will have the
second thoughts on whether to use or not. I have read the article by Dave.
Thanks for that reference too.


On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Frederick Cheung <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Friday, September 14, 2012 8:24:53 AM UTC+1, Panayotis Matsinopoulos
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since "belongs_to" does not actually reflect (as an English wording) the
>> real association that one object might have to another, I was thinking
>> about aliasing it using the following code:
>>
>> class ActiveRecord::Base
>>   class << self
>>     alias :refers_to :belongs_to
>>     alias :is_of     :belongs_to
>>     alias :has_a     :belongs_to
>>   end
>> end
>>
>> Well I think that would work, but personally I wouldn't - I think you're
> sacrificing readability of the source (people have to know/remember about
> your extensions) just to make it sound better in english (has_a in
> particular muddies the water further between has_one & belongs_to). Dave
> Thomas articulated this better than I could a while ago:
> http://pragdave.blogs.pragprog.com/pragdave/2008/03/the-language-in.html
>
>
> Fred
>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-talk/-/PiHuxshy4Y0J.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
Panayotis Matsinopoulos
*P.S.:* I am sending SMS over the WEB using Rayo SMS <http://sms.rayo.gr/>
*E-mail*: [email protected]
*Site:* http://www.matsinopoulos.gr
*Mobile:* +30 697 26 69 766
*Skype Id: *panayotis.matsinopoulos
*Facebook: *http://www.facebook.com/PanayotisMatsinopoulos
*Twitter:* http://www.twitter.com/pmatsino
*LinkedIN:* http://www.linkedin.com/in/panayotismatsinopoulos
*Github*: https://github.com/pmatsinopoulos
*Rubygems:* https://rubygems.org/profiles/55099
*CodeProject:* http://www.codeproject.com/Members/PanayotisMatsinopoulos
*ODesk Profile:* https://www.odesk.com/users/~~c84135e75d1f2303

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to