I just noticed that your error does, in fact, appear in my output.
However, if I run inside of the rails console I don't see the redundant
"Here". i.e.:
/Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 659 > rails c
Loading development environment (Rails 3.2.13)
irb(main):001:0> c = Campaign.new
=> #<Campaign id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil, recurrence_id: nil>
irb(main):002:0> c.recurrence = Recurrence.new
=> #<Recurrence id: nil, created_at: nil, updated_at: nil>
irb(main):003:0> c.save!
(0.1ms) begin transaction
SQL (5.1ms) INSERT INTO "recurrences" ("created_at", "updated_at")
VALUES (?, ?) [["created_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11 UTC +00:00],
["updated_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11 UTC +00:00]]
Here
SQL (0.5ms) INSERT INTO "campaigns" ("created_at", "recurrence_id",
"updated_at") VALUES (?, ?, ?) [["created_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11
UTC +00:00], ["recurrence_id", 1], ["updated_at", Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:15:11
UTC +00:00]]
Here
(49.1ms) commit transaction
=> true
irb(main):004:0> c
=> #<Campaign id: 1, created_at: "2013-06-03 15:15:11", updated_at:
"2013-06-03 15:15:11", recurrence_id: 1>
irb(main):005:0>
My guess is it's a "test mode" artifact of some kind.
On Monday, June 3, 2013 11:13:26 AM UTC-4, Rick wrote:
>
> I cannot duplicate your error running your github example. Here's what I
> see:
>
> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 656 > rails --version
> Rails 3.2.13
> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 657 > ruby --version
> ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24 revision 39474) [x86_64-darwin12.3.0]
> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 658 > ruby -Itest test/unit/campaign_test.rb
> Run options:
>
> # Running tests:
>
> [1/1] CampaignTest#test_create_a_campaign_with_recurrenceHere
> Here
> Finished tests in 0.195217s, 5.1225 tests/s, 0.0000 assertions/s.
> 1 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
>
> ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p0 (2013-02-24 revision 39474) [x86_64-darwin12.3.0]
> /Dagnan/rails_inverse_of 659 >
>
> On Monday, June 3, 2013 1:55:29 AM UTC-4, Michel Pigassou wrote:
>>
>> Help?
>>
>> On Friday, May 31, 2013 7:39:30 PM UTC+2, Michel Pigassou wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I created an app to illustrate my problem:
>>> https://github.com/Dagnan/rails_inverse_of
>>>
>>> I have a model with a belongs_to, and the other with a has_one. So far
>>> so good.
>>> When I configure the option inverse_of on both model and I perform a
>>> simple #save on the main object, it is actually saved two times (once saved
>>> and then updated).
>>>
>>> *Is it an expected behavior?*
>>>
>>> A way to avoid this problem would be not to use inverse_of, or to have
>>> "autovalidate: false" in the second model (Recurrence in my example) for
>>> the has_one association.
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/e13e4aef-5ca6-49d7-88fd-17d1c584bf1c%40googlegroups.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
