On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:03 AM, Fahad Idrees <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, i want to deploy my website sort of chat website. > I am expecting more than 50K online users at it's peak time. > I don't want to compromise on optimization and page speed and don't want user > to wait too long for page to load. > > Any one suggest me best hosting for RAILS, some comparison and contrast are > highly appreciated. > I have found heroku,amazon and bluehost are good to host in ROR. But which > one is more stable in my scenerio? First off, there is no "best" as in it will be the best for everyone, every situation, etc., etc., etc. Most of my experience is using AWS, and while it does work well, it can also be a major pain. Heroku is dead easy, of course, but suffers from performance issues sometimes. I’m not sure if you can throw enough money at Heroku to make it better. Your best bet, really, is to take a step away from the decision that you must choose one and only one provider. If you develop your deployment to be disposable at the drop of a hat, immutable, and so on, then you’ll also generally be able to pick up and move hosts at a moment’s notice as well, and thus be able to respond faster to host downtimes and failures. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/0D6DDFCC-8049-4364-A1C2-C7F29109273A%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
