Thanks. 

My question  was specific to Rails/ActiveRecord. 

Roelof


Op zondag 7 september 2014 22:35:45 UTC+2 schreef Jason FB:

>
>
> FWIW, we're not entirely sure if you're asking specifically about data 
> modeling (like a general CS question) or a question specific to 
> Rails/ActiveRecord. You probably would do yourself well to get advice about 
> your system from someone with computer science experience, specifically 
> building transactional systems.
>
> Generally speaking from my own experience with transactional systems, 
> ActiveRecord has some drawbacks that don't optimize for scale. In 
> particular, if the set of operations requires lots and lots of objects to 
> be loaded during any given transaction, ActiveRecord has a high cost (slow) 
> associated with object instantiation. This doesn't affect most Rails apps 
> if they create 25-50 objects in the lifecycle of any given request, but 
> when a request is going to create hundreds and hundreds of objects you're 
> going to see some bottlenecks at scale. (I'm not sure if this really 
> applies to you -- just some background as you are going down this path.)
>
> This doesn't mean that Rails is the wrong solution -- it just means you 
> have to think about the bigger picture and perhaps know a little more about 
> architecture than you do right now. Other alternatives to ActiveRecord 
> (Datamapper) do not have as high a cost of object instantiation so might be 
> good options for a problem like this. 
>
> There are yet other advanced design patterns for transactions and banking 
> systems too -- for example, just check out all the discussion about things 
> other people have solved before you on the "Transactional processing 
> system" Wikipedia page: 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transaction_processing_system
>
> All of those concerns are out of the scope of Rails & ActiveRecord. 
>
> If I were you I'd learn a little more about your domain problem and back 
> up and research different options, then prototype some in Rails and see if 
> you measure how fast common operations take. 
>
> -Jason
>
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Roelof Wobben <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> The problem is if it is the best to put all in seperate models or if there 
> is a better solution ?
>
> Roelof
>
>
> Op zondag 7 september 2014 18:11:13 UTC+2 schreef Colin Law:
>
>> On 7 September 2014 17:07, Roelof Wobben <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> > Transactions could be a model for all the transactions that take place 
>> on 
>> > accounts. 
>> > Like  a payment or a new invoice. 
>>
>> So what is the problem? 
>>
>> Colin 
>>
>> > 
>> > Roelof 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Op zondag 7 september 2014 14:25:00 UTC+2 schreef Colin Law: 
>> >> 
>> >> On 7 September 2014 12:23, Roelof Wobben <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> >> > Almost, 
>> >> > 
>> >> > I could do that but then how do I store the transactions. 
>> >> > Another models transactions which points to accounts ? 
>> >> 
>> >> Sorry, I have no idea what you mean.  You have not mentioned 
>> >> transactions before, is a transaction another model.  If so exactly 
>> >> what is the problem. 
>> >> 
>> >> Colin 
>> >> 
>> >> > 
>> >> > Roelof 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > Op zondag 7 september 2014 11:14:40 UTC+2 schreef Colin Law: 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> On 7 September 2014 08:14, Roelof Wobben <[email protected]> 
>> wrote: 
>> >> >> > Hello, 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > I try to make a financial app. 
>> >> >> > Now I have this problem. 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > I have customers which are put into a model. 
>> >> >> > What I want is if I made a customer also a financial account is 
>> made 
>> >> >> > with a 
>> >> >> > specific number. 
>> >> >> > So customer 1 has account number 16001. 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > If the customer buys anything a invoice is made and must be put 
>> into 
>> >> >> > the 
>> >> >> > right 1600x number. 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > How can I do this with models ? 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Not sure what question you are asking.  Is it what should the 
>> models 
>> >> >> and relationships be?  If so then possibly something like 
>> >> >> customer has_one account 
>> >> >> account belongs_to customer 
>> >> >> and account has a field account_number (which will contain 16001 in 
>> >> >> the above case). 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Colin 
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Roelof 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > -- 
>> >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>> Google 
>> >> >> > Groups 
>> >> >> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. 
>> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> >> >> > send 
>> >> >> > an 
>> >> >> > email to [email protected]. 
>> >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>>
>> >> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/79408f0b-7c2d-458d-8e2c-d68c929f9bbf%40googlegroups.com.
>>  
>>
>> >> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>> >> > 
>> >> > -- 
>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> >> > Groups 
>> >> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. 
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>> send 
>> >> > an 
>> >> > email to [email protected]. 
>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>> >> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/dc95ff34-6d50-48bf-b976-cde053b71c1a%40googlegroups.com.
>>  
>>
>> >> > 
>> >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups 
>> > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an 
>> > email to [email protected]. 
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. 
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> > 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/92ddd696-b55a-4861-b178-fb6bfd7302c7%40googlegroups.com.
>>  
>>
>> > 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/ed49f94f-f399-40c8-8dba-9b91f0b5464d%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/ed49f94f-f399-40c8-8dba-9b91f0b5464d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/0fd0ee53-4dd6-4690-92df-49805beb3c72%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to