at first glance it seems reasonable Sent from my iPhone
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 08:43, [email protected] wrote: > > I was talking with @sgrif about this in this ticket > https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/19570. > > I think the current validates_length_of is pretty fine expressing thinks like > "the username is too long", and the tokenizer is ideal for strings situations > but when it comes to arrays, collections, etc is really strange to override > the message error and not being able to use some kind of selector. > > I did this gist to test this out > https://gist.github.com/mmontossi/984f8ebfd50ea843b5f2 > > I was using this validator to thinks like: > > validates_count_of :photos, within: 1..3, selector: ->(photos) { > photos.reject(&:marked_for_destruction?) } > > This allows to have new errors.messages keys to express quantity: > > errors.messages.too_many > errors.messages.too_few > errors.messages.wrong_count > > Anyone shares this point of view? > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/4fbcca9f-1cc6-4fae-bb4a-fd482021bcf4%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/249D5980-CA8A-4DAB-A45D-071FD3B6FA48%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
