Short answer: yes. I've been running that pair for a while now on one of my apps.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Sivakumar G <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a rail 3.2.19 application running on ruby 1.9.3 and passenger > 3.0.19. We upgraded ruby to 2.1.5 and passenger to 4.0.57 and ran into the > following issues post deployment. > > 1) Some of the update queires generated had 0=0 instead of actual query's > where clause > 2) Some of the select queries the realtion name in the where clause was > missing. > > Is rails 3.2 compatible with Ruby 2.1.5? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/26e077c2-3b1f-48cf-81d0-4af7d4369b13%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/26e077c2-3b1f-48cf-81d0-4af7d4369b13%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/CA%2BCQ935og28N4raGF61ocrtbb7bg2nBW3erg%2Bq62_Jdj-jw9DQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
