Hi, There are some networking solutions for sqlite http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteNetwork You could always design a front end for it in rails :-)
you can trim your rails app of some of the parts of rails it doesn't need. Thats all set in the environment.rb file. # Skip frameworks you're not going to use. To use Rails without a database # you must remove the Active Record framework. # config.frameworks -= [ :active_record, :active_resource, :action_mailer ] Rob On Jan 24, 1:07 am, Rick Fiorentino <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am just curious what the options are for small footprint databases. I > understand SQLite is available, are there others in production use as > well? I'd appreciate any recommendations etc. Firebird? > > SQLite seems pretty good but remote access goes out the window because > it is a server-less design if I understand things correctly. > > Also, is it possible to skinny down the ruby and required gems/libraries > distribution? Is there a lite version of Ruby on Rails? > > We have multiple deployment scenarios and it would be advantageous to > have a small footprint distribution. > > Thanks for the help, > Rick > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
