Sorry to butt in, and this is unconfirmed info, but I swear that I heard a rumor of Rails 3 (the new Rails/Merb combo powerhouse) support for Maurício's concept of routes "areas."
It would be a nice way to separate things out and lazy load only what you need at run time. Having a routes folder with specialized routes (even that dreaded default when needed) would be sweet. Routes do get rather large even on some simple apps and it would be nice to have a way to trim things down. +1 for that idea, Maurício. On Jan 23, 4:02 pm, Simone Guerra <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks again Maurício, good advices as before. Maybe I was too used with > the classic small CRUD routing idea, but I guess that as long as it > doesn't create any slowness problem probably the big routes file is > unavoidable for complex applications. > -- > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
