On 5 Feb, 10:47, Frederick Cheung <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 11:06 pm, Gabriele Tassoni <[email protected]>
> wrote:
Hi Frederick,
thank you for the anwser.
>
> Not that I can think of. even if it did work I expect you;d just end
> up with a scope that it is equivalent to the first, slow, scope since
> a scope is by definition not much more than a set of options to pass
> to a single call to find (or count etc...)
>
I can understand, but a find returns an Array, a named_scope, a
Scope... It looks like there's a bit of inconsistency on how active
record results are showed.. I would have expected that any, ehrm..
say... list of results would be always the same object, and that there
would be a way to upgrade a resultset expressed as an Array to a Scope
(that's, from what i can see, the same array proxied as a Scope) or
any other resultset format used..
G.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
