I stumbled on the fact that text_area_tag does not HTML escape its
content by default. For example:

  text_area_tag "body", "</textarea><script>alert('xss');<script>"

If you try that, you'll see that the content is inserted literally.
Considering the fact that the tag helpers all encode their attribute
values by default, does this surprise anyone else?

I found a ticket on this issue from a couple years ago from Chris Mear
but it looks like it was dropped:
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5929

It seems like there were two main arguments against encoding:

1. backwards compatibility
2. some people depend on this behavior to allow HTML in their text
area boxes

#2 I don't really understand. You can allow HTML...just escape it.
It's equivalent to allowing HTML in a text field tag, no? You have to
either know the value is sanitized or escape it.

#1 I can understand, but that's not a show-stopper, right? There have
been numerous non-backwards-compatible changes adopted by introducing
them slowing, providing config options, etc.

I'm guessing there's quite a few people using text_area_tag and
assuming the content is being safely escaped by default. And every one
of them is an XSS problem.

It's an issue with anything that uses content_tag, of course. Try
this, for example:

  label_tag 'foo', "</lable><script>alert('xss2')</script>"

At the very least, are we amendable to adding a note in the
FormTagHelper docs about the escaping rules?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to